A number of states have enacted laws prohibiting Chinese and others from “countries of concern” from purchasing homes or land.
U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, "Hearing: China’s Five-Year Plan, Indigenous Innovation and Technology Transfers, and Outsourcing," June 15, 2011
Wednesday June 15, 2011
216 Hart Senate Office Building
Constitution Avenue and 2nd Street, NE
Washington, DC 20002
Co-chairs: Vice Chairman Daniel Slane and Commissioner Patrick Mulloy
Prepared Statement of Commissioner Patrick A. Mulloy
Good morning and thank you for coming to today’s hearing. In this hearing the Commission will examine “China’s New Five Year Plan, Indigenous Innovation and Technology Transfers, and Outsourcing.” It is the eighth and final hearing of this reporting cycle.
For those who are new to our hearings, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission is a bipartisan Congressionally-chartered Commission composed of 12 members, six of whom are selected by the Majority and Minority leaders of the Senate and six by the Speaker and the Minority Leader of the House. The Commission was established by Congress in 2000 to review the national security implications of trade and economic ties between the United States and the People’s Republic of China. The Commission has a broad-ranging mandate that includes examining other aspects of the U.S.-China relationship, such as China’s growing military and political power.
The Commission’s charter specifically charges it, among other things, to analyze “the qualitative and quantitative nature of the transfer of United States production activities to the People’s Republic of China, including the relocation of high technology, manufacturing, and research and development facilities, the impact of such transfers on United States national security, the adequacy of United States export control laws, and the effect of such transfers on United States economic security and employment.”
Pursuant to that latter provision, today’s hearing will examine key facets of China’s industrial policies, their impact on industries and job creation in the United States, and the outsourcing of jobs to China. Since 1953, the Communist Party of China has used a series of five-year plans to guide China’s economic and social development. In its newly-adopted 12th Five-Year Plan China makes clear that it hopes to move up the manufacturing value chain by making explicit mention of Strategic Emerging Industries, which the Chinese government would like to see dominated by Chinese firms. These industries are: New-generation information technology, high-end equipment manufacturing, advanced materials, alternative-fuel cars, energy conservation and environmental protection, alternative energy, and biotechnology. China’s goal is to take the Strategic Emerging Industries from a current combined share of 3% of Chinese GDP to 8% by 2015 and 15% by 2020.
One of the tools the Chinese government will use to grow these Strategic Emerging Industries is indigenous innovation. This policy seeks to help China move up the value-added chain. Indigenous innovation policies have drawn criticism from the U.S. and European business communities and policy makers because China uses this policy to require foreign companies to transfer their higher technologies and know-how as a condition of doing business in China or getting government procurement contracts in China.
China is doing this despite the fact that in joining the WTO it agreed to eliminate forced technology transfers. China claims that it is not violating that commitment because the decisions being made by foreign companies to transfer technology for market access are purely business decisions.
These are very important issues, and we have excellent witnesses today to help up shed some light on them, and to consider possible solutions. I would like to remind the members of our audience that all of the written statements submitted for the record are available on our website, www.uscc.gov. A transcript of today’s hearing also will be published on our website at a later date.
Panel I: China's 12th Five-Year Plan
Dr. Willy C. Shih, Professor of Management Practice, Harvard Business School
Dr. Eswar Prasad, Nandlal P. Tolani Professor of Trade Policy, Cornell University, and Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution
Panel II: Indigenous Innovation and Industrial Policy
Dr. Adam Segal, Ira A. Lipman Senior Fellow for Counterterrorism and National Security Studies, Council on Foreign Relations
Mr. John Neuffer, Vice President for Global Policy, Information Technology Industry Council
Dr. Dieter Ernst, Senior Fellow, East-West Center
Panel III: Technology Development and Transfers to China
Dr. Ralph E. Gomory, Research Professor, NYU Stern School of Business and President Emeritus, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Mr. Leo Hindery, Jr., Chairman, U.S. Economy/Smart Globalization Initiative, New America Foundation, New York, NY [Testimony]
Dr. Philip I. Levy, Resident Scholar, American Enterprise Institute
Chinese companies are among the world's largest video game firms. They are on the move in some of the fastest growing markets.
Throughout its history, the Chinese Communist Party has sought to dictate what is written and taught about its past. And some have always found ways to offer a fuller picture of what they and others have experienced.