Join us for a free one-day workshop for educators at the Japanese American National Museum, hosted by the USC U.S.-China Institute and the National Consortium for Teaching about Asia. This workshop will include a guided tour of the beloved exhibition Common Ground: The Heart of Community, slated to close permanently in January 2025. Following the tour, learn strategies for engaging students in the primary source artifacts, images, and documents found in JANM’s vast collection and discover classroom-ready resources to support teaching and learning about the Japanese American experience.
Genealogies of Chinese Sovereignty Since 1492
UC Berkeley presents Teemu Ruskola's talk to consider China's place in the world as a matter of the changing politics of sovereignty, space, and time.
Where
Colloquium: Center for Chinese Studies
Teemu Ruskola, School of Law, Emory University
Global China Colloquium IV
How did the multiethnic Qing empire (1644-1911) on the eastern edge of the Eurasian landmass become an “international legal person” with the proper name “China”—that is, a sovereign nation-state in a world of other, formally equal nation-states? Historically the law of nations emerged as the constitution of Europe: a set of constitutive norms that governed the relationship among the so-called “Family of Nations.” As this historically specific legal order has become globalized by means of colonialism, it has become effectively the constitution of the world.
Where is China in the world made by modern international law? The growing literature on the colonial origins of international law is concerned with the juridical implications of the “discovery” of the New World. The chief legal justifications for European domination that emerged from the collision with the Americas worked reasonably well in other places so long as Europeans were dealing with peoples they could characterize to their own satisfaction as “barbarians” or “savages” (say, the inhabitants of Africa) or peoples whose political existence could be denied altogether (say, the indigenous people’s of Australia whose land was deemed uninhabited terra nullius). Yet ancient Oriental civilizations such as China were more difficult to dismiss. Chinese culture was evidently very different from Europe’s, but it had all the markers of a “high” civilization even as defined by Europeans themselves, thus causing a catachresis in crude binaries such as civilized/savage and sovereign/colonizable.
The Orient, in the historical sense of the term, thus demands a theoretical account of its own, no less than America, and so does China as the dominant Oriental civilization on the eastern end of Eurasia.
Featured Articles
Please join us for the Grad Mixer! Hosted by USC Annenberg Office of International Affairs, Enjoy food, drink and conversation with fellow students across USC Annenberg. Graduate students from any field are welcome to join, so it is a great opportunity to meet fellow students with IR/foreign policy-related research topics and interests.
RSVP link: https://forms.gle/1zer188RE9dCS6Ho6
Events
Hosted by USC Annenberg Office of International Affairs, enjoy food, drink and conversation with fellow international students.
Join us for an in-person conversation on Thursday, November 7th at 4pm with author David M. Lampton as he discusses his new book, Living U.S.-China Relations: From Cold War to Cold War. The book examines the history of U.S.-China relations across eight U.S. presidential administrations.