Join us for a free one-day workshop for educators at the Japanese American National Museum, hosted by the USC U.S.-China Institute and the National Consortium for Teaching about Asia. This workshop will include a guided tour of the beloved exhibition Common Ground: The Heart of Community, slated to close permanently in January 2025. Following the tour, learn strategies for engaging students in the primary source artifacts, images, and documents found in JANM’s vast collection and discover classroom-ready resources to support teaching and learning about the Japanese American experience.
Congressional-Executive Committee on China, Ongoing Challenges Faced by Persons with Diabilities in the People's Republic of China, Dec. 3, 2023
The U.S. Congressional-Executive Commission on China was created by Congress in October 2000 with the legislative mandate to monitor human rights and the development of the rule of law in China.
December 3, 2023
The full report is available in PDF format at the link at the bottom of the page. The Commission's website is at https://www.cecc.gov.
*****
In observance of the International Day of Persons with Disabilities, this report examines the People’s Republic of China’s compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, focusing on the government’s capacity to provide public services and on institutional obstacles that contribute to disparities in access to healthcare and assistance.
I. U.N. Treaty Body Review
In August 2022, the United Nations (U.N.) Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities reviewed the compliance of state party People's Republic of China (PRC) with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).[1] Ahead of the review, the Committee received submissions from nine nongovernmental organizations (NGOs).[2] Except for two that were affiliated with the Chinese government,[3] these organizations called attention to a pattern of rights violations against persons with disabilities and a lack of effective measures addressing them, covering a range of issues including gender-based violence,[4] shackling and trafficking of persons with psychosocial disorders,[5] inadequate access to healthcare and justice,[6] targeting of rights defenders,[7] and increasing restrictions on civil society groups that provide services and engage in advocacy.[8] In October 2022, the Committee issued its Concluding Observations, echoing concerns raised by these independent civil society groups.[9] The discussion below supplements and contextualizes the Concluding Observations and NGO submissions in selected issue areas relating to challenges faced by persons with disabilities in China.
II. Government Assistance Programs and Their Limitations
The PRC government’s disability policies are focused on poverty alleviation and social welfare assistance for persons with disabilities contingent on obtaining certification of disability. This approach, however, does not “necessarily address the first of the general principles of the CRPD, which is about the right to autonomy.”[10] The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights highlighted the lack of a consistent “human rights model of disability” across policy and legislation in China.[11] In addition, reports indicate that dereliction of duty and corrupt practices by officials undermine the effectiveness of public assistance programs.[12] These factors, along with the PRC’s top-down, authoritarian style of governance have contributed to the persistence of poverty[13] and violations of the rights of people with disabilities, despite the existence of several cash transfer programs.
According to official statistical data, the Chinese government estimated there to be 85 million persons with disabilities in China;[14] however, only 37.8 million of them had registered with the official system maintained by the China Disabled Persons’ Federation (CDPF) and the National Health Commission (NHC).[15] Successful registration results in the issuance of a disability certificate stating that a person falls into one of seven categories of disability—visual, hearing, speech, physical, intellectual, mental, and multiple disabilities—each divided into four levels of severity (mild, moderate, severe, and most severe).[16]
Since the disability certificate is a condition for receiving public assistance,[17] the high percentage of people not registered, standing at over 44 percent of China’s disabled population, may correspond to the number of people who do not have access to assistance.[18] Moreover, the actual extent of the problem may be larger, given that the 85 million figure puts the number of people with disabilities at around 6 percent of China’s total population, which likely is an underestimation,[19] when compared to the 16 percent global average estimated by the World Health Organization in 2022.[20]
This low rate of registration may be attributed to a number of factors, including the cost of obtaining an evaluation by an officially designated facility,[21] inaccessibility of evaluation facilities,[22] concerns about stigma and discrimination, poor understanding of government policies, and the obstacles that people with limited physical mobility face during the registration process.[23] Officials at some localities reported improvements in the registration rate through efforts such as visiting people’s homes to raise awareness of relevant policies and to process registration,[24] but the low rate of registration persisted as of 2021.[25]
Disability certificates, at least in theory, entitle their holders to various discounts and accommodation at educational and entertainment venues, healthcare facilities, and for services such as transportation.[26] Other financial assistance programs include the following:
o Minimum Living Standard Guarantee
Unemployed persons assessed as having a severe to most severe level of disability are eligible for the minimum living standard guarantee program (zuidi shenghuo baozhang, or dibao),[27] which is a cash transfer program that started in urban areas in the 1990s and expanded to cover rural areas beginning in 2007.[28] This program, however, amplifies benefit disparities because an increasing number of programs use dibao as the default basis of eligibility, other forms of assistance are automatically inaccessible to those ineligible for dibao, thereby disregarding people’s individual needs.[29]
While dibao offers a degree of stability, recipients live on amounts far lower than the median income level. A key component of the dibao program is the income reference benchmark, an amount that varies based on locality separately set by local governments.[30] Specifically, a person’s income must be below the dibao benchmark to be eligible, and the amount of assistance provided is the difference between the person’s income and the reference benchmark.[31] Based on data released by the Ministry of Civil Affairs for the first quarter of 2022, the median dibao benchmark was 674 yuan (approximately US$100) per month per urban resident and 488 yuan (approximately US$70) per rural resident.[32] As a reference, the National Bureau of Statistics reported that the median monthly income of an urban resident during the same period was 3,907 yuan (approximately US$575) and that of a rural resident was 1,536 yuan (approximately US$225).[33] Based on these figures, dibao payment may be insufficient for subsistence as it is capped at 17 percent of the median disposable income for urban residents and 32 percent for rural residents.[34]
o “Two Allowances” for Sustenance and Nursing
In September 2015, the PRC government established a program to provide allowances to 1) indigent persons with disabilities and 2) persons with severe disabilities for their nursing costs (liangxiang butie, or “two allowances”).[35] Like dibao, the amount of the “two allowances” also varies by locality.[36] According to a January 2023 article, the monthly amount in 11 province-level jurisdictions ranged from 75 yuan (approximately US$11) to 188 yuan (approximately US$27) for indigent subsidies, and from 75 yuan to 252 yuan (approximately US$37) for nursing subsidies for persons with severe disabilities.[37] Receipt of “two allowances” does not disqualify a person from receiving dibao.[38]
o “Tekun” Support for Particularly Difficult Situations
In October 2016, the Ministry of Civil Affairs established a program to provide financial support to persons in particularly difficult situations, including persons with severe or most severe level of intellectual, mental, and physical disabilities (tekun renyuan jiuzhu gongyang, or tekun).[39] The Ministry expanded the program in 2021 to include persons with most severe level of visual disability.[40] Like dibao, this program is limited by the financial resources of local governments.[41] Allowances may be granted for care received at home or at an institution such as a mental health facility.[42] Recipients of tekun support are ineligible for dibao and “two allowances,”[43] but they may receive subsidies for health insurance, as do dibao recipients.[44]
o Development-Oriented Support
In addition to giving cash allowances, the PRC government has instituted programs that encourage independent living.[45] These programs include requiring and incentivizing employers to train and hire persons with disabilities,[46] and administrative and tax benefits for self-employment and entrepreneurship.[47] Unlike cash allowances, an inexhaustive review shows that this type of program is not limited to persons with severe disability.[48]
A recent study showed that although “[p]ersons with disabilities aged 16–59 who are not incapacitated and in need of employment services are mainly provided with employment services,” improvement in their income is comparatively limited, which may be attributed to the traditional mindset that “it is acceptable for persons with disabilities to be relegated to lower-paying [and] less-valued jobs”; moreover, the government “provides minimal direction in ensuring that the disabled and their families have a decent income.”[49] The study further revealed that the quality of life of people with psychiatric or multiple disabilities did not significantly improve as a result of employment services, leading the authors to recommend that the PRC government adjust employment service measures for people in these categories.[50]
III. Lack of Participation and Civil Society Support
The space for the provision of services is dominated by a government-controlled organization, and public participation by persons with disabilities is limited. This institutional arrangement amplifies the detrimental effect of the top-down style of governance in part because it restricts the flow of information relevant to policymaking, creating gaps in service provision.[51] The China Disabled Person’ Federation (CDPF) is a government-controlled organization responsible for duties including facilitating communication between the government and persons with disabilities, helping formulate laws and policies related to this field, reducing stigma and discrimination, and “providing guidance” to civil society groups.[52] The CDPF in turn “receives guidance” and funding from the government and serves as a conduit of policy directives from the Chinese Communist Party.[53] Five specialized associations operate under the CDPF, each representing a category of disability.[54] As of 2021, the CDPF and its subordinate associations maintained a total of over 538,000 branches at the township level and above, constituting the most prevalent type of organizations in the field.[55] Other types of organizations include registered nonprofit organizations and voluntary groups that are generally not registered.[56]
In addition to being under the “guidance” of the CDPF, civil society groups are facing increasing political control and legal restrictions. Central authorities have promulgated or amended policies and laws that may negatively impact the operations of civil society groups. These include the following:
- The PRC National Security Law, which defines “national security” broadly, and thereby subject civil society groups to additional scrutiny and potentially expose them to penalties;
- The PRC Law on the Management of Overseas Nongovernmental Organizations’ Activities in Mainland China, which generally requires these organizations to register with public security bureaus, an onerous process that may have contributed to the increase in the number of foreign NGOs opting to deregister after 2017 when the law took effect;
- The PRC Charity Law, which imposes heavy fines on fundraising activities by non-registered or nonprofit groups that seek donations online; and
- Ministry of Civil Affairs directives that require civil society groups to establish Party branches and acknowledge the total leadership of the Party, potentially subordinating charity and service provision work to political directives.[57]
In its submission to the CRPD Committee, the international NGO Chinese Human Rights Defenders highlighted individuals who were detained because of their advocacy for disability rights and groups that had shut down as a result of official actions.[58] For example, Yirenping, an anti-discrimination advocacy organization, shut down in 2015, after which “[m]any former employees and volunteers of Yirenping were detained, harassed or intimidated,” with two of them being detained for about a month on the charge of “illegal business activity.”[59] Another advocacy organization called Changsha Funeng likewise shut down in 2019, and three of its members were charged with “subversion” and sentenced to terms of imprisonment ranging from two to five years.[60] [See Civil Society chapters in the Commission’s past annual reports and its Political Prisoner Database for more information on persecution of civil society workers.]
Despite instances of suppression, local CDPF officials have awarded contracts to some nonprofit organizations for delivering social services to persons with disabilities.[61] These organizations, however, lack access to alternative sources of funding, due to restrictions on fundraising, which affected service stability and fostered competition rather than cooperation among them.[62] One scholarly article further noted that “there seems to be little, if any, involvement of disabled people in the design, delivery and evaluation of the services for them outside the officially approved channel.”[63]
IV. Inequality in Access to Healthcare
Access to healthcare is one aspect of the universal right to life, according to the treaty monitoring body for the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.[64] The PRC’s social control policies, however, hinder people with disabilities from realizing this right. Persons with disabilities in China face multidimensional obstacles to accessing healthcare, making them vulnerable to other health conditions, such as chronic illnesses.[65] Rural residents are confronted with an additional layer of difficulty, as they have a significantly higher rate of poverty and have access to fewer healthcare resources and less robust infrastructures, as compared with urban residents.[66] These gaps are exacerbated by the mandatory household registration (hukou) system, which designates a place of registration as either urban or rural and ties access to resources (such as medical care, health insurance, and social welfare) to a person’s place of registration.[67] According to a 2021 study, “rural hukou was associated with an important 13–40% increase in unmet health-care needs for people with disabilities in China.”[68] The implication of this is significant because over 79 percent of persons with disabilities are rural residents.[69]
Besides the urban-rural divide, the hukou system excludes access to resources by the “floating population,” a term used by authorities to primarily refer to rural residents who have moved to urban areas for work but lack a “local hukou at their de facto place of residence . . . .”[70] While central authorities in 2014 abolished the urban-rural distinction for household registration purposes,[71] the change did not achieve equal access to healthcare because only a small number of internal migrants were eligible to move their hukou to a city, and facilities in rural areas continued to lag behind.[72] As of 2021, the government did not have a national policy specifically focused on providing protection and services to persons with disabilities who are part of the floating population.[73]
In addition, the scope of the healthcare needs of persons with disabilities within the floating population is poorly understood by Chinese authorities, according to a 2021 editorial in the CPPCC Daily authored by a district-level people’s political consultative conference from Chongqing municipality.[74] The floating population is estimated to have reached 376 million in 2020,[75] but the number of people with disabilities among the migrant population is not known.[76] The CPPCC Daily editorial recommended that the central government conduct a census to determine the number of people with disabilities in the floating population; assess the scope of the population’s health, rehabilitation, and social integration needs; and develop national policy and implementation mechanisms specific to persons with disabilities.[77]
V. Mishandling of Emergency Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic
The death of a teenager with cerebral palsy in January 2020, six days after his father and sole caregiver was quarantined on suspicion of COVID infection, exposed inadequacies and lack of sensitivity in China’s emergency response during the COVID-19 outbreak.[78] During this time, the teenager was only fed twice and multiple emergency calls made by his father and volunteers did not yield medical assistance.[79] A paper pointed out that the PRC Law on Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases “did not incorporate considerations for the needs of people with disabilities in situations of risk and humanitarian emergencies,” falling short of the requirements under Article 11 of the CRPD.[80] In addition to the shortcomings in the legal framework, the implementation of the government’s COVID measures “[paralyzed] transportation, businesses, logistical circulation and many more services,” causing disruption to the provision of “supplies and services including the assistive devices, timely medication [and] caretaking services” needed by persons with disabilities.[81]
VI. Vulnerability of Women with Psychosocial Disorders to Trafficking and Domestic Violence
While the Chinese legislature has enacted laws to prohibit offenses against persons with disabilities,[82] legal provisions that specifically protect women with psychosocial disabilities from abuses such as domestic violence and human trafficking are still lacking. For example, the October 2022 amendment to the PRC Law on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests does not substantially strengthen protections for women with psychosocial disabilities.[83]
Moreover, according to a civil society report entitled “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” existing legal provisions create a conflict that makes it “difficult to file a case when the victim’s right is infringed by the guardian, including one’s spouse.”[84] The report states that “[t]he right to life of women with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities is oftentimes threatened rather than protected when entering marriage,” and “[s]ometimes the public security and civil affairs departments both shirked responsibility and did not act properly . . . .”[85] In one example, a family of three tortured and caused the death of a new bride who was reported as having an intellectual disability.[86] Before her death, local police declined to intervene, treating the matter as “a domestic affair between a legitimate husband and wife . . . .”[87]
Additional datapoints illustrate the extent of the problem:
An analysis of 616 judicial case files involving trafficking in women from 2017 to 2020 shows that 20% of the 1,252 women trafficked in China had disabilities . . . . And more than 60% of the women with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities were abducted by strangers passing by in outdoor locations such as roadsides, stations, and fields. Another study of 1,038 first-instance judgments involving the crime of trafficking in women and children from January 2000 to July 2017 shows that 26.7% of the victims suffered from varying degrees of mental illness.[88]
In one widely publicized case, a woman reported to be mentally impaired was shown in a video chained in a shed in Jiangsu province.[89] The woman, originally from Yunnan province, reportedly was sold several times before being sold to her current husband, surnamed Dong, with whom she had eight children.[90] Public criticism drew attention to the local government’s apparent disregard for human trafficking,[91] the violation of the national birth limit policy, and the woman’s abusive living conditions,[92] the inconsistencies in the official investigative reports about her background,[93] and lax criminal penalties for “buyers” of trafficked persons.[94] In April 2023, a court sentenced Dong to nine years in prison for “abuse” (nuedai) and “illegal imprisonment” (feifa jujin) of the woman, noting the deterioration of her mental illness during multiple pregnancies.[95] The court sentenced five of the traffickers to terms of imprisonment ranging from 8 to 13 years.[96]
Human Rights Watch used the case to illustrate the wider problem of bride trafficking, pointing out that China’s previous population control policy, which permitted couples to have only one child and caused a sex imbalance due to male child preference, along with the availability of sex-selective abortion, drove the internal and cross-border trafficking of women.[97] Many victims come from vulnerable communities, and it is difficult for international organizations to monitor the abuse due to heavy government censorship.[98]
VII. Conclusion
While the PRC has taken steps to assist persons with disabilities, the various safety nets devised by the government have been shown to be insufficient in terms of amount and access. This may be attributed to institutional and political factors, including the exclusion of civic groups and the intended beneficiaries from the design and implementation of these assistance programs due to the government’s continuing authoritarian control over the distribution of resources. Additionally, social control policies such as the household registration system and the lack of effective counter-human trafficking measures render certain subsets of the disabled population particularly vulnerable. The PRC government, therefore, should not only increase the amount and types of assistance, but it should also undergo meaningful policy and structural reforms to accommodate greater adherence to the international standards as laid out in the CRPD.
[1] U.N. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Concluding Observations on the Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports of China, adopted by the Committee at its 610th Meeting on September 1, 2022, CRPD/C/CHN/CO/2-3, October 10, 2022, https://perma.cc/ZCY3-VMWU.
[2] “Ratification, Reporting & Documentation for China,” U.N. Treaty Body Database (webpage), accessed January 3, 2023, https://perma.cc/R3AL-ZV9P.
[3] China Association for Persons with Physical Disabilities, “CAPPD Submission to the Committee for Consideration on the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in China,” July 29, 2022, https://perma.cc/TWS9-HPFT; “中国肢残人协会章程” [Charter of China Association of Persons with Physical Disabilities], passed September 15, 2018, arts. 1, 5, https://perma.cc/YN2X-QUA2; Caring Home Special Education Rehabilitation Training Centre for Children, “Opinions for the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the Implementation of the Convention in China,” July 25, 2022, 1, 8, https://perma.cc/AT8V-4PFZ.
[4] Canyu, “Parallel Report for Constructive Dialogue on the Combined Second and Third Reports of the People’s Republic of China and Responses to the List of Issues and the State Party’s Reply─Focusing on Women with Disabilities and Gender-based Violence,” July 22, 2022, 5–6, https://perma.cc/ZZ6Z-DZ4B; “‘Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind’─Regarding the Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in China,” July 2022, 6–7, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[5] Human Rights Watch, “Human Rights Watch Submission on China to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 27th Session,” July 2022, 1, 2, https://perma.cc/46EU-KBVY; “‘Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind’─Regarding the Implementation of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities in China,” July 2022, 4, 7, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[6] “‘Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind’─Regarding the Implementation of the Convention on the
Rights of Persons with Disabilities in China,” July 2022, 2, 3, 8, 9, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP; Canyu, “Parallel Report for Constructive Dialogue on the Combined Second and Third Reports of the People’s Republic of China and Responses to the List of Issues and the State Party’s Reply─Focusing on Women with Disabilities and Gender-based Violence,” July 22, 2022, 6, https://perma.cc/ZZ6Z-DZ4B.
[7] Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, paras. 14–17, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB..
[8] Canyu, “Parallel Report for Constructive Dialogue on the Combined Second and Third Reports of the People’s Republic of China and Responses to the List of Issues and the State Party’s Reply─Focusing on Women with Disabilities and Gender-based Violence,” July 22, 2022, 2, https://perma.cc/ZZ6Z-DZ4B; International Service for Human Rights, “Information for the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on the occasion of the adoption of a List of Issues for the review of the People’s Republic of China, 13th Pre-Sessional Working Group, 30 March–3 April 2020,” February 6, 2020, 2, https://perma.cc/7Y9G-T8AM; Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, para. 13, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB.
[9] U.N. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Concluding Observations on the Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports of China, adopted by the Committee at its 610th Meeting on September 1, 2022, CRPD/C/CHN/CO/2-3, October 10, 2022, paras. 16, 18, 24, 26, 32, 34, 36, 44, 56, https://perma.cc/ZCY3-VMWU.
[10] Xintong Zhao and Chao Zhang, “From Isolated Fence to Inclusive Society: The Transformational Disability Policy in China,” Disability & Society 33, no. 1 (January 2, 2018): 133, https://perma.cc/T6FZ-URCJ.
[11] Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, “Concluding Observations on the Third Periodic Report of China, Including Hong Kong SAR, China, and Macao SAR, China,” E/C.12/CHN/CO/3, March 3, 2023, paras. 39–40, https://perma.cc/H5SW-3LYT.
[12] See, e.g., “社区低保专干贪污170余万元，他们用身边鲜活的案例敲警钟查漏洞” [Grafting by community-level official specialized in dibao involved amounts exceeding 1.7 million yuan; [event participants] use an actual example to sound the alarm for the need to examine loopholes], Changjiang Net, April 2, 2021, https://perma.cc/76HF-HLXM; “低保监管执行形同虚设 贪腐黑手频伸向百姓救命钱” [Dibao supervision is practically nonexistent; corrupt hands habitually grab people’s life-saving money], Economic Information Daily, reprinted in Finance.China.com.cn, November 24, 2015, https://perma.cc/UT8A-DZ6C.
[13] Human Rights Council, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights on His Mission to China, A/HRC/35/26/Add.2, March 28, 2017, para. 34, https://perma.cc/868Y-ZGJ2.
[14] U.N. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, “Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports Submitted by China under Article 35 of the Convention, Due in 2018,” June 19, 2019, para. 1, https://perma.cc/FX6L-D8UU.
[15] National Bureau of Statistics of China, 中国残 疾人事业统计年鉴—2021 [China Statistical Yearbook on the Work for Persons with Disabilities—2021] (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021), 28, https://perma.cc/NE5G-F7KB; Guangdong Disabled Persons’ Federation, 中华人民共和国残疾人证管理办法 [Measures of the People’s Republic of China for the Administration of Disability Certificates], effective January 1, 2018, arts. 4, 6, https://perma.cc/6D43-D5DZ.
[16] Guangdong Disabled Persons’ Federation, 中华人民共和国残疾人证管理办法 [Measures of the People’s Republic of China for the Administration of Disability Certificates], January 1, 2018, arts. 5, 7, https://perma.cc/6D43-D5DZ; PRC State Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection, and Quarantine, “残疾人残疾分类和分级” [Classification and Grading Criteria of Disability], January 14, 2011, sec. 5.1, https://perma.cc/BW9J-PNCQ.
[17] See, e.g., “16万残疾人仅5.7万人办残疾证 办的人为何这么少？” [Why are Only 57,000 out of 160,000 Persons with Disabilities Applying for Disability Certificates?], Zhejiang Xinwen, April 20, 2016, https://perma.cc/9M6U-NB25; Ministry of Civil Affairs, “民政部 财政部 中国残联关于加强残疾人两项补贴精准管理的意见” [Views of the Ministry of Civil Affairs, Ministry of Finance, and China Disabled Person’ Federation on Strengthening the Accurate Management of the Two Subsidies for the Disabled], October 18, 2022, https://perma.cc/J3HV-CRNV; “平等、参与、共享：新中国残疾人权益保障70年” [Equality, Participation, and Sharing: 70 Years of Safeguarding of the Rights and Interests of the Disabled in New China], Xinhuanet, July 25, 2019, https://perma.cc/HMF4-6L9W.
[18] “16万残疾人仅5.7万人办残疾证 办的人为何这么少？” [Why are Only 57,000 out of 160,000 Persons with Disabilities Applying for Disability Certificates?], Zhejiang Xinwen, April 20, 2016, https://perma.cc/9M6U-NB25; U.N. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, “Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports Submitted by China under Article 35 of the Convention, Due in 2018,” June 19, 2019, par. 1, https://perma.cc/FX6L-D8UU; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 中国残 疾人事业统计年鉴—2021 [China Statistical Yearbook on the Work for Persons with Disabilities—2021] (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021), 28, https://perma.cc/NE5G-F7KB.
[19] U.N. Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, “Experts of the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Commend China on Reforms Made since the Initial Review, Ask Questions on the Independence of Persons with Disabilities in the Community and on Home Schooling,” August 19, 2022, https://perma.cc/7LGJ-L3QE.
[20] World Health Organization, “Disability,” December 2, 2022, https://perma.cc/4PE4-5AL4.
[21] Guangdong Disabled Persons’ Federation, 中华人民共和国残疾人证管理办法 [Measures of the People’s Republic of China for the Administration of Disability Certificates], effective January 1, 2018, art. 17, https://perma.cc/6D43-D5DZ.
[22] Guangdong Disabled Persons’ Federation, “残联职能转变背景下的广东农村残疾人服务保障体系构建” [The Construction of the Guangdong Rural Disabled Service Guarantee System under the Background of the Functional Transformation of Disabled Persons’ Federation], January 3, 2020, https://perma.cc/EEP5-DZ6Z.
[23] “16万残疾人仅5.7万人办残疾证 办的人为何这么少？” [Why are Only 57,000 out of 160,000 Persons with Disabilities Appling for Disability Certificates?], Zhejiang Xinwen, April 20, 2016, https://perma.cc/9M6U-NB25.
[24] See, e.g., Guangdong Provincial Government Service Data Administration, “残疾人证办理常见问题如何解决？” [How Will the Common Problems of the Handicapped Certificate Application be Solved?], December 15, 2021, https://perma.cc/7NMR-DPPB; Bomi County People’s Government, “集中办理残疾证 贴心服务暖人心” [Centralized Handling of Disability Certificates: Genial Public Services], July 27, 2022, https://perma.cc/SNS5-VAVN; “16万残疾人仅5.7万人办残疾证 办的人为何这么少？” [Why are Only 57,000 out of 160,000 Disabled People Apply for Disability Certificates?], Zhejiang Xinwen, April 20, 2016, https://perma.cc/9M6U-NB25.
[25] U.N. Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, “Combined Second and Third Periodic Reports Submitted by China under Article 35 of the Convention, Due in 2018,” June 19, 2019, para. 1, https://perma.cc/FX6L-D8UU; National Bureau of Statistics of China, 中国残 疾人事业统计年鉴—2021 [China Statistical Yearbook on the Work for Persons with Disabilities—2021] (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021), 28, https://perma.cc/NE5G-F7KB.
[26] See, e.g., Chinese Organization for Scleroderma, “残疾证及残疾人补贴” [Disability Certificate and Disability Allowance], 2017, https://perma.cc/C5BH-32HW; Pingyang County People’s Government, “平阳县残疾人免费坐公交车” [Disabled People in Pingyang County Can Take the Bus for Free], August 25, 2022, https://perma.cc/2RV9-W9CT; China Association of Persons with Physical Disabilities, “中国民航局发布《残疾人航空运输管理办法》” [The Civil Aviation Administration of China issued the “Administrative Measures for Air Transport for Persons with Disabilities”], December 26, 2014, https://perma.cc/F8UC-2RLA; Luoyang Antique Management Bureau, “延吉恐龙博物馆试运营开馆 每天两场免费讲解” [The Trial Operation of the Yanji Dinosaur Museum: Free Guided Tours Twice a Day], May 26, 2021, https://perma.cc/XQT3-E39T;; 中华人民共和国残疾人保障法 [Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Persons with Disabilities], October 26, 2018, art. 50, https://perma.cc/7ZYT-L4C6.
[27] Yuling Hao and Rikui Xiao, “How Disability Income Benefits Affect Employment for Persons with Disabilities in China: An Impairment-Based Work Disability Assessment Perspective.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 6 (2022): 3-4, https://perma.cc/A5S3-E8CK.
[28] Nanak Kakwani, Shi Li, Xiaobing Wang, and Mengbing Zhu, “Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Rural Minimum Living Standard Guarantee (Dibao) Program in China.” China Economic Review 53 (February 2019), https://perma.cc/8XYV-SL2N; Qian Wang and Hongxia Bi, “我国农村最低生活保障标准研究” [Research on my country’s Rural Minimum Living Guarantee Standards], National Bureau of Statistics, October 25, 2016, https://perma.cc/8ZUH-7N76.
[29] Yuling Hao and Rikui Xiao, “How Disability Income Benefits Affect Employment for Persons with Disabilities in China: An Impairment-Based Work Disability Assessment Perspective.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 6 (2022): 5, 12, https://perma.cc/A5S3-E8CK.
[30] See, e.g., Ministry of Civil Affairs, “2022年1季度低保标准” [2022 First Quarter Minimum Living Standard], 2022, https://perma.cc/VQ4F-KYKY; People’s Government of Guangdong Province, 广州市最低生活保障办法 [Measures for the Guangdong Minimum Subsistence Wage], March 3, 2022, arts. 2, 25, https://perma.cc/EK7Z-3C7M.
[31] See, e.g., Ministry of Civil Affairs, “2022年1季度低保标准” [2022 First Quarter Minimum Living Standard], 2022, https://perma.cc/VQ4F-KYKY; People’s Government of Guangdong Province, 广州市最低生活保障办法 [Measures for the Guangdong Minimum Subsistence Wage], March 3, 2022, arts. 2, 25, https://perma.cc/EK7Z-3C7M.
[32] Ministry of Civil Affairs, “2022年1季度低保标准” [2022 First Quarter Minimum Living Standard], 2022, https://perma.cc/VQ4F-KYKY.
[33] National Bureau of Statistics, “2022年一季度居民收入和消费支出情况” [Residential Income and Consumption Expenditure in the First Quarter of 2022], April 18, 2022, https://perma.cc/9RX5-7JM9.
[34] Ministry of Civil Affairs, “2022年1季度低保标准” [2022 First Quarter Minimum Living Standard], 2022, https://perma.cc/VQ4F-KYKY; National Bureau of Statistics, “2022年一季度居民收入和消费支出情况” [Residential Income and Consumption Expenditure in the First Quarter of 2022], April 18, 2022, https://perma.cc/9RX5-7JM9.
[35] PRC State Council, “国务院关于全面建立困难残疾人生活补贴和重度残疾人护理补贴制度的意见” [State Council Opinion on Comprehensively Establishing a System of Living Subsidies for People with Disabilities and Nursing Subsidies for the Severely Disabled], September 22, 2015, sec. 2(1), https://perma.cc/3BK5-JNH9; China Disabled Persons Federation, “Consolidating the Safety Net in Guaranteeing Basic Livelihoods of People with Disabilities in the 13th Five-Year Plan,” December 28, 2020, https://perma.cc/EFE2-DTFP.
[36] National Rural Property Rights Trading Platform, “残疾人两项补贴标准2023：每人每月多少钱？附各地标准！” [The 2023 Two Allowances Standards for Persons with Disabilities: How Much per Person per Month? Various Regional Standards Attached!], December 2, 2022, https://perma.cc/TBU2-P692.
[37] Gao Lei, “多地残疾人两项补贴制度实现提标扩面” [In Many Areas, the Two Allowances System for Persons with Disabilities Has Achieved Expansion and Raised Standards], Xinhua, January 21, 2023, https://perma.cc/NRM3-MLNV.
[38] “2021年有低保才能有两项补贴，真的是这样吗？” [In 2021, Only with Subsistence Allowance Can One Have the Two Allowances. Is This Really the Case?], Sina Corporation, October 22, 2021, https://perma.cc/SGR5-KBJ7; Gao Lei, “托起残疾人群体‘ 稳稳的幸福’——残疾人两项补贴制度兜牢残疾人基本民生保障底线” [Supporting the “Stable Happiness” of the Community of Persons with Disabilities: The Two Allowances Systems for Persons with Disabilities Guarantee the Bottom Line of Basic Livelihood], Xinhua, December 3, 2021, https://perma.cc/4C42-ATUM.
[39] Ministry of Civil Affairs, 《特困人员认定办法》 [Measures for the Identification of the Extremely Impoverished], October 10, 2016, art. 5, https://perma.cc/FB8A-8DLM.
[40] Ministry of Civil Affairs, 《特困人员认定办法》 [Measures for the Identification of the Extremely Impoverished], April 26, 2021, art. 5(3), https://perma.cc/BC9L-QXUA.
[41] “全国人民代表大会常务委员会预算工作委员会、全国人民代表大会财政经济委员会、全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会关于财政社会保障资金分配和使用情况的调研报告” [Research Report on the Allocation and Use of Fiscal Social Security Funds by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee Budget Working Committee, National People’s Congress Financial and Economic Committee, and National People’s Congress Social Construction Committee], December 2022, https://perma.cc/E6SE-XR3N.
[42] Ministry of Civil Affairs, “特困人员入住供养服务机构集中供养的条件是什么？” [What Are the Requirements for the Extremely Impoverished to Live in a Centralized Support Service Institution?], April 2, 2020, https://perma.cc/TT7W-Z7GJ; Fujian Province Department of Civil Affairs, Social Assistance Office, “什么是特困人员集中供养？” [What Is Centralized Support for the Extremely Impoverished?], January 20, 2021, https://perma.cc/JS7T-ZJ4F; “太原市调整特困人员供养标准” [Taiyuan Municipality Adjusts Support Standards for the Extremely Impoverished], August 15, 2022, https://perma.cc/3PVT-HBRR.
[43] “民政部：特困人员救助供养与低保不能重复享受” [Ministry of Civil Affairs: The Extremely Impoverished Cannot Enjoy Both the Relief Support and the Subsistence Allowances], China News Network, February 23, 2016, https://perma.cc/Z76S-BUJ7; Kuang Chunlin, “长沙：“三无”特困人员可纳入供养范围” [Changsha: The “Three No’s” That Can Put the Extremely Impoverished in the Range of Support], Changsha Evening News, February 9, 2018, https://perma.cc/PJ3H-P7CE.
[44] See, e.g., Zhao Wen, “农村特困人员低保对象可获医保资助” [The Extremely Impoverished and Recipients of Subsistence Allowance in Rural Areas Can Receive Medical Insurance Subsidies], Haikou Daily, November 7, 2021, https://perma.cc/72CZ-88ZD; Guangdong Province Healthcare Security Administration, “广东省人民政府办公厅关于健全重特大疾病医疗保险和救助制度的实施意见” [Guangdong Province People’s Government Office Implementing Opinion on Strengthening the Medical Insurance and Assistance System for Serious Diseases], January 4, 2023, https://perma.cc/RBS9-PTFS.
[45] Yuan Wang, Cai Yun Qi, and Yueqi Zhu. “Poverty Alleviation for People with Disabilities in China: Policy, Practice, Exclusionary Effects, and Ways Forward.” Disability & Society 37, no. 6 (July 3, 2022): 1060–65, https://perma.cc/2CB7-N5YS.
[46] Song Zijie and Zhou Jingyuan, “人社部：扩大残疾人就业服务供给 强化职业技能培训” [Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security: Expand the Supply of Employment Services for Persons with Disabilities and Strengthen Vocational Skills Training], People’s Daily, April 15, 2022, https://perma.cc/U5C2-9VW6; PRC State Council, 残疾人就业条例 [Disabled Employment Regulations], issued February 25, 2007, effective May 1, 2007, art. 8, https://perma.cc/KB2E-9GE9; State Taxation Administration, “关于促进残疾人就业税收优惠政策的通知” [Circular on Preferential Tax Policies for Promoting the Employment of Persons with Disabilities], issued June 15, 2007, sec. 1(1), https://perma.cc/8EKH-TNKR.
[47] China Disabled Persons Federation et al., “关于扶持残疾人自主就业创业的意见” [Opinion on Supporting Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship of Persons with Disabilities], January 12, 2018, secs. 1, 2, 3, https://perma.cc/KQ2G-XJ6B.
[48] Song Zijie and Zhou Jingyuan, “人社部：扩大残疾人就业服务供给 强化职业技能培训” [Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security: Expand the Supply of Employment Services for Persons with Disabilities and Strengthen Vocational Skills Training], People’s Daily, April 15, 2022, https://perma.cc/U5C2-9VW6; PRC State Council, 残疾人就业条例 [Disabled Employment Regulations], issued February 25, 2007, effective May 1, 2007, art. 8, https://perma.cc/KB2E-9GE9; State Taxation Administration, “关于促进残疾人就业税收优惠政策的通知” [Circular on Preferential Tax Policies for Promoting the Employment of Persons with Disabilities], issued June 15, 2007, sec. 1(1), https://perma.cc/8EKH-TNKR; China Disabled Persons Federation et al., “关于扶持残疾人自主就业创业的意见” [Opinion on Supporting Self-Employment and Entrepreneurship of Persons with Disabilities], January 12, 2018, secs. 1, 2, 3, https://perma.cc/KQ2G-XJ6B.
[49] Xiaofeng Wang, Jiamin Guo, and Hu Li, “Multidimensional Poverty of Persons with Disabilities in China: An Analysis of Poverty Reduction Effect of Employment Services,” Frontiers in Public Health 11 (2023), https://perma.cc/8RPD-A5D6.
[50] Xiaofeng Wang, Jiamin Guo, and Hu Li, “Multidimensional Poverty of Persons with Disabilities in China: An Analysis of Poverty Reduction Effect of Employment Services,” Frontiers in Public Health 11 (2023), https://perma.cc/8RPD-A5D6.
[51] See, e.g., R.M. Mthethwa, “Critical Dimensions for Policy Implementation,” African Journal of Public Affairs 5, no. 2 (2012): 42, https://perma.cc/8QVM-HKMS.
[52] “中国残疾人联合会章程” [Charter of China Disabled Persons’ Federation], passed September 18, 2013, arts. 6, 7, 11, 13, https://perma.cc/U6B6-ZJT9.
[53] See, e.g., “中国残疾人联合会” [China Disabled Persons’ Federation], accessed January 27, 2023, https://perma.cc/N7A9-86DB; “国务院残疾人工作委员会的主要职责” [Main Duties of the State Council Committee on Persons with Disability], May 7, 2009, https://perma.cc/GWS7-BN4Q;; Zihao Lin, “Writing Down Our Happiness and Dreams: Essay Contest and the Statist Narratives of Deaf Identity in China,” Disability & Society 36, no. 1 (January 28, 2020): 40; “中国残联传达学习党的二十大精神” [China Disabled Persons Federation delivers the spirit of studying the Party’s 20th National Congress], People’s Daily, October 27, 2022, https://perma.cc/PK7B-R4PG; “中国残疾人联合会章程” [Charter of China Disabled Persons’ Federation], passed September 18, 2013, art. 24, https://perma.cc/U6B6-ZJT9.
[54] “中国残疾人联合会章程” [Charter of China Disabled Persons’ Federation], passed September 18, 2013, arts. 17, 24, https://perma.cc/U6B6-ZJT9; Zihao Lin, “Writing Down Our Happiness and Dreams: Essay Contest and the Statist Narratives of Deaf Identity in China,” Disability & Society 36, no. 1 (January 28, 2020): 39.
[55] National Bureau of Statistics of China, 中国残 疾人事业统计年鉴—2021 [China Statistical Yearbook on the Work for Persons with Disabilities—2021] (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021), 106, https://perma.cc/NE5G-F7KB. See also Xinye Wu and Weixu Wu, “Mapping the Development of Disabled People’s Organizations in China: Main Types and Current Status,” Disability & Society 37, no. 2 (October 18, 2021): 352, 355, https://perma.cc/9VB8-URKN.
[56] Xinye Wu and Weixu Wu, “Mapping the Development of Disabled People’s Organizations in China: Main Types and Current Status,” Disability & Society 37, no. 2 (October 18, 2021): 353, https://perma.cc/9VB8-URKN.
[57] Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, para.9, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB; “Fact Sheet on China’s Foreign NGO Law,” China NGO Project, ChinaFile, Asia Society, November 1, 2017, https://perma.cc/ED6K-3CU4; Freedom House, ‘‘China,’’ in Freedom in the World 2022, February 2022, https://perma.cc/L6KZ-LQ7E.
[58] Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, para.13, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB.[ZTR 9U2N34N2]
[59] Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, para.13, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB.
[60] Chinese Human Rights Defenders, “Civil Society Report Submitted to the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for its Review at the 27th Session of the Combined Second and Third Periodic Report of the People’s Republic of China (CRPD/C/CHN2-3),” June 7, 2022, para.13, https://perma.cc/ZCZ8-39SB.
[61] Ting Zhao and Jurgen Grotz, “The Changing Landscape of Public Service Delivery Systems for Disabled People in China: A Shanghai Case Study,” Disability & Society 34, no. 3, January 30, 2019, 500–501, https://perma.cc/37VE-JM3T.
[62] Ting Zhao and Jurgen Grotz, “The Changing Landscape of Public Service Delivery Systems for Disabled People in China: A Shanghai Case Study,” Disability & Society 34, no. 3, January 30, 2019, 502, https://perma.cc/37VE-JM3T; Can Cui and Jie Wu, “Alternative to Civil Society Governance: Platform Control over the Third Sector in China,” Journal of Asian Public Policy (August 25, 2022): 4, 5, 14.
[63] Ting Zhao and Jurgen Grotz, “The Changing Landscape of Public Service Delivery Systems for Disabled People in China: A Shanghai Case Study,” Disability & Society 34, no. 3, January 30, 2019, 499, https://perma.cc/37VE-JM3T.
[64] Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 36, CCPR/C/GC/36, September 3, 2019, https://perma.cc/P63A-KUF2; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted and proclaimed by U.N. General Assembly resolution 217A (III) of December 10, 1948, art. 3; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted by U.N. General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of December 16, 1966, entry into force March 23, 1976, art. 6.
[65] Qi Kang, Gang Chen, Jun Lu, and Huijiong Yu, “Health Disparities by Type of Disability: Health Examination Results of Adults (18–64 Years) with Disabilities in Shanghai, China,” PLoS ONE 11, no. 5 (May 19, 2016): 2, https://perma.cc/Y4NN-7HUM.
[66] Bin Guo et al., “Inequality in the Health Services Utilization in Rural and Urban China,” Medicine 99(2) (January 2020): 2, https://perma.cc/Z2T3-YY5K.
[67] Xintong Zhao and Hongchuan Wang, “Disparities in Unmet Health Service Needs among People with Disabilities in China,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 33, no. 4 (October 6, 2021), https://perma.cc/YCU8-7LTA; Xiang Wang, “Permits, Points, and Permanent Household Registration: Recalibrating Hukou Policy under ‘Top-Level Design,’” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 49, no. 3 (2020): 272–73, https://perma.cc/GXD7-QEQ9.
[68] Xintong Zhao and Hongchuan Wang, “Disparities in Unmet Health Service Needs among People with Disabilities in China,” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 33, no. 4 (October 6, 2021): 5, https://perma.cc/YCU8-7LTA.
[69] National Bureau of Statistics of China, 中国残 疾人事业统计年鉴—2021 [China Statistical Yearbook on the Work for Persons with Disabilities—2021] (Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021), 31, https://perma.cc/NE5G-F7KB.
[70] Xiang Wang, “Permits, Points, and Permanent Household Registration: Recalibrating Hukou Policy under ‘Top-Level Design,’” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 49, no. 3 (2020): 272, https://perma.cc/GXD7-QEQ9.
[71] State Council, “国务院关于进一步推进户籍制度改革的意见” [State Council’s Opinion on Further Improving Household Registration System Reforms], issued July 30, 2014, sec. 3(9), https://perma.cc/MAW3-TCCJ; Xiang Wang, “Permits, Points, and Permanent Household Registration: Recalibrating Hukou Policy under ‘Top-Level Design,’” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 49, no. 3 (2020): 275, https://perma.cc/GXD7-QEQ9.
[72] Nong Yan, “取消农业户口不影响保护农民权益” [Abolition of agricultural household registration does not affect protection of rights and interests of agricultural residents], Economic Daily, September 22, 2016, https://perma.cc/5V69-4RKB.
[73] Nan’an District, Chongqing Municipal People’s Political Consultative Conference, “城市残障流动人口生存状态亟待关注” [Livelihood of floating population with disability in cities deserving of grave concern], CPPCC Daily, November 29, 2021, https://perma.cc/GSW6-CQMP.
[74] Nan’an District, Chongqing Municipal People’s Political Consultative Conference, “城市残障流动人口生存状态亟待关注” [Livelihood of floating population with disability in cities deserving of grave concern], CPPCC Daily, November 29, 2021, https://perma.cc/GSW6-CQMP.
[75] “第七次全国人口普查主要数据情况” [Main data from the seventh national census], National Bureau of Statistics, May 11, 2021, https://perma.cc/748Z-EN9F.
[76] Nan’an District, Chongqing Municipal People’s Political Consultative Conference, “城市残障流动人口生存状态亟待关注” [Livelihood of floating population with disability in cities deserving of grave concern], CPPCC Daily, November 29, 2021, https://perma.cc/GSW6-CQMP.
[77] Nan’an District, Chongqing Municipal People’s Political Consultative Conference, “城市残障流动人口生存状态亟待关注” [Livelihood of floating population with disability in cities deserving of grave concern], CPPCC Daily, November 29, 2021, https://perma.cc/GSW6-CQMP.
[78] “父亲和弟弟被隔离后 湖北16岁脑瘫患儿一步步走向死亡” [Hubei 16 year-old youth with cerebral palsy nearing death as father and younger brother were quarantined], China Morning Newspaper, February 1, 2020, https://perma.cc/NS3A-XVFJ.
[79] “父亲和弟弟被隔离后 湖北16岁脑瘫患儿一步步走向死亡” [Hubei 16 year-old youth with cerebral palsy nearing death as father and younger brother were quarantined], China Morning Newspaper, February 1, 2020, https://perma.cc/NS3A-XVFJ;; “Coronavirus: Disabled boy dies in China after father quarantined,” BBC, February 3, 2020, https://perma.cc/P5P5-QMYG.
[80] Fei Qi and Luanjiao Hu, “Including People with Disability in the COVID-19 Outbreak Emergency Preparedness and Response in China,” Disability & Society 35, no. 5 (April 13, 2020): 849.
[81] Fei Qi and Luanjiao Hu, “Including People with Disability in the COVID-19 Outbreak Emergency Preparedness and Response in China,” Disability & Society 35, no. 5 (April 13, 2020): 850.
[82] 中华人民共和国刑法 [PRC Criminal Law], passed July 1, 1979, revised March 14, 1997, amended December 26, 2020, effective March 1, 2021, art. 240; 中华人民共和国反家庭暴力法 [PRC Anti-Domestic Violence Law], passed December 27, 2015, effective March 1, 2016, arts. 2, 5, 33, 34, https://perma.cc/625S-C5FW; 中华人民共和国民法典 [PRC Civil Code], passed May 28, 2020, effective January 1, 2021, arts. 1041, 1042, https://perma.cc/YGC5-US56; 中华人民共和国残疾人保障法 [PRC Law on Safeguarding the Rights of the Disabled], passed December 28, 1990, amended October 26, 2018, arts. 7, 40, 67, https://perma.cc/7ZYT-L4C6.
[83] 中华人民共和国妇女权益保障法 [PRC Law on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests], passed April 3, 1992, amended October 30, 2022, effective January 1, 2023, https://perma.cc/RH4D-SP68; Chen Yun, “中国新修订的妇女权益保障法的具体落实和监督面临挑战” [Implementation and supervision challenges faced by the newly amended Law on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests], Voice of America, November 8, 2022, https://perma.cc/H5JF-R3SE. See also Yang Longyue Yang Zhen, “《妇女权益保障法》修订能否回应”打拐”关切？” [Can amendments to the Law on the Protection of Women’s Rights and Interests address concerns over “combating kidnapping”?], Knews, February 22, 2022, https://perma.cc/R244-JJ96.
[84] “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” August 15, 2022, 8, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[85] “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” August 15, 2022, 5, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[86] “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” August 15, 2022, 5, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[87] “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” August 15, 2022, 5, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[88] “Leaving No Sister with Disabilities Behind,” August 15, 2022, 6, 7, https://perma.cc/3UCM-ZKJP.
[89] Liyan Qi, “In China, Footage of a Chained-Up Rural Mother of Eight Draws Outcry,” Wall Street Journal, February 1, 2022; Viola Zhou, “Chained Mother of 8 Exposes Horrors of Human Trafficking in China,” Vice, March 4, 2022, https://perma.cc/FW77-3YSW..
[90] “‘Fengxian shengyu ba hai nuzi’ shijian shisan wen—Xinhuashe jizhe fang Jiangsu Shengwei Sheng Zhengfu diaocha zu fuzeren” [13 questions on the case of “The Feng County woman who gave birth to eight children”—Xinhua News Agency reporter interviews the head of the investigation team of the Jiangsu Provincial Party Committee and Provincial Government], Xinhua, February 23, 2022, https://perma.cc/54UW-22V2.
[91] “Muddle over Woman in Chains in China Stirs Online Anger with Authorities,” Reuters, February 8, 2022, https://perma.cc/Y4RR-CSV8.
[92] Manya Koetse, “Mother of Eight Found Chained Up in Shed Next to Family Home in Xuzhou,” What’s on Weibo, January 29, 2022, https://perma.cc/XP8Q-MUF3; “On International Women’s Day, Chinese Citizens Continue to Pressure PSB, Government Over Abuse and Trafficking of Women,” China Digital Times, March 7, 2022, https://perma.cc/VE8N-PHXA.
[93] “More Questions Than Answers Two Weeks After Uproar over Chained Mother in Xuzhou,” SupChina, February 16, 2022, https://perma.cc/3QWQ-8P5F.
[94] Li Yuan, “Seeking Truth and Justice, Chinese See Themselves in a Chained Woman,” New York Times, March 1, 2022, https://perma.cc/9Y44-XBSX; Guo Rui, “In China, Buying Trafficked Women and Children Gets Less Jail Time Than Buying Illegal Plants or Animals,” South China Morning Post, February 18, 2022, https://perma.cc/93Z5-KCZX.
[95] Frances Mao, “Chained Woman Case: Six Jailed in Trafficking Case That Horrified China,” BBC, April 7, 2023, https://perma.cc/F8FJ-TDQW; Duan Xuanju, Liu Jiang, and Zhu Guoliang, “‘丰县生育八孩女子’事件相关案件一审及后续情况六问” [Six questions about the first-instance decision and follow-up circumstances in the case of the “woman from Feng county who gave birth to eight children”], Xinhua, April 7, 2023, https://perma.cc/J5LH-VSCE.
[96] “‘丰县生育八孩女子’事件相关案件一审公开宣判” [Trial court announces judgment in a case relating to “the woman who gave birth to eight children in Fengxian”], Xuzhou Intermediate People’s Court, reprinted in China Fund, https://perma.cc/3GDR-FMBL; Zhang Chen, “董志民虐待、非法拘禁案和时立忠、谭爱庆等人拐卖妇女案一审宣判” [The first-instance decision announced in the case of Dong Zhimin’s abuse and illegal detention [of his wife] and the case of Shi Lizhong, Tan Aiqing and others’ abduction and trafficking of a woman], Legal Daily, April 8, 2023, https://perma.cc/8GX5-J97K.
[97] Heather Barr and Yaqiu Wang, Human Rights Watch, “Chained Woman Has Become the Face of Bride Trafficking in China,” June 7, 2022, https://perma.cc/QJA3-9N5Y. Cindy Yik-Yi Chu, “Human Trafficking and Smuggling in China,” Journal of Contemporary China, 20, no. 68 (2011), 39–52.
[98] Heather Barr and Yaqiu Wang, Human Rights Watch, “Chained Woman Has Become the Face of Bride Trafficking in China,” June 7, 2022, https://perma.cc/QJA3-9N5Y.
Featured Articles
October 20, 2024
October 20, 2024
Please join us for the Grad Mixer! Hosted by USC Annenberg Office of International Affairs, Enjoy food, drink and conversation with fellow students across USC Annenberg. Graduate students from any field are welcome to join, so it is a great opportunity to meet fellow students with IR/foreign policy-related research topics and interests.
RSVP link: https://forms.gle/1zer188RE9dCS6Ho6
Events
Wednesday, November 20, 2024 - 3:00pm
Hosted by USC Annenberg Office of International Affairs, enjoy food, drink and conversation with fellow international students.
Thursday, November 7, 2024 - 4:00pm
Join us for an in-person conversation on Thursday, November 7th at 4pm with author David M. Lampton as he discusses his new book, Living U.S.-China Relations: From Cold War to Cold War. The book examines the history of U.S.-China relations across eight U.S. presidential administrations.